1 2 3 4 5 10 15 20 25 40 | bottom
Quote# 126431

5 Dragons Caught On Tape & Spotted In Real Life!

Description:

Dragons. They are large, mighty, and a common occurrence…in fantasy novels and RPGs. In ancient times, dragons were viewed as deities. They were considered the guardians of the Earth and of mankind. But somehow throughout the years, dragons evolved into two cultural subsets: either they are viewed as cute creatures that make great house pets, or they are seen as vicious, hobbit-killers. Regardless of how you view them, what if there was evidence that they existed? Today, we have five videos where dragons have been spotted in the wild. Let’s begin…

Top 5 Finest, youtube 23 Comments [4/19/2017 12:11:37 AM]
Fundie Index: 4

Quote# 126488


I find it puzzling that this topic is still up for debate, yet the sentiments of many Western Christians is that you can love Jesus without loving the church. Verbose arguments abound on the church not being confined to a building – that all spaces are sacred and therefore, filled with divine presence. The well-worn argument that the church does not consist of the physical space you occupy while worshipping God, but instead the body of believers, contains just enough truth to lure readers to their inevitable conclusion:
Church attendance is optional. Serving the brethren, again, is optional. Loving the brethren? Still optional. Feeling guilty about not wanting to go to church? Don’t worry about it; that’s the fault of institutionalized religion.

They then do a follow up post called The Real Reason Evangelicals and Millennials [insert people group] are Leaving the Church, where again, they pander to what people want to hear. So long as you subject the Scriptures to tokenism and appeal to sentimentalism, people will eat it up. Soon enough they’ll be in the woods celebrating “communion” with Coca Cola and cookies.

I’m not denying that some churches simply aren’t churches per the definition of Scripture; what I am speaking against is the underwhelming opinion that you can somehow be part of the universal church and reject the local church, or that the local church is made up of you and your family on a Sunday morning as you lay in bed and reject communion with the saints and sitting under the proclamation of the Scriptures.

The reality is that the entire New Testament presupposes you are going to be part of an institutionalized, local church. People wish to delve into semantics and separate the location from the body of believers, but that isn’t the point of defining what the local church is. Yes, the building could be demolished overnight and the church would still exist – however, that local church still meets in time and space. That local church still has a designated structure made up of elders, teachers, deacons, evangelists, etc., for the edification of the whole man until the saints reach unity in the faith and the knowledge of Christ (Eph. 4:11-16). The church is made up of living stones that is being built up as a spiritual house into a holy priesthood for service to Christ (1 Pt. 2:5) and they are members of one another (Rom. 12:5; Eph. 4:25, 1 Cor. 12:12-27), and are present within a local community.
Even still, the author of Hebrews indicates that we are to not forsake gathering with God’s people because of the hope we have in Christ, so that we might encourage one another to perseverance in the faith (Heb. 10:19-25). The idea being presented is that the confidence we have to enter the presence of God through Christ, being able to hold to the hope we profess without wavering, and drawing near to God with a sincere heart in full assurance, is directly related to the notion that we are intimately connected to this local body.

What’s more than all of this is that a local church is not a church without some semblance of this God-given functionality and structure. A group of three people without the headship of elders and teachers is not the church. They are part of the global church – but they are not a substitute for the local church. There are always exceptions to the rule, yet the exception does not prove the rule; special provisions do not institute a normative ecclesiology. The text never presupposes the rugged individualism indicative of American Evangelicalism.

We know Paul was prohibited from communing with the saints whilst in chains. We also know that many churches are confined to secret rendezvous, have gone without official teachers/elders for a period, etc. No one is speaking of things literally barring another from being able to be among the saints and sit under the Word, or a temporary, ecclesial detriment; it is the willful forsaking of the brethren and the eschewing of God’s good gifts.

While there are things worthy of introspection from the church – I don’t believe this to be one of them. There aren’t a host of reasons why people are fleeing from the church in groves. There aren’t many reasons why professing Christians are leaving the church. There may be healthy reasons why one leaves a particular local church, but when it comes to reasons why one leaves the church entirely, there’s really only one: they don’t love the church. Synonymously, they don’t love Christ.

The apostle John is about as straightforward as one can get in saying that the way children of God and children of the devil can be distinguished is that children of the devil are those who eschew righteousness and the love of the brethren (1 Jn. 3:10). This isn’t some strange new teaching – it is what they (and we) have heard from the beginning (v. 11-13). If that’s not clear enough, he then says that anyone who hates his brother remains in death and is a murderer (vv. 14-15).

Furthermore, he condemns mere tokenism toward brotherly love; one must demonstrate this love in action and truth (v. 18). Much like the author of Hebrews, John maintains that by these things we will not only have knowledge that we are children of God, but assurance of our salvation (vv. 19-20).

The modern notion that you can worship God just as much by yourself as you can within the confines of the church is patently false and anti-biblical. It flies in the face of the Scripture’s teaching on the importance of the body of Christ, the proper structure of the church, and the goodness of the spiritual gifts that God has bestowed for the benefit of His people.

I sense that if one were to have a conversation with the apostle John on this, it would go similarly:

Objector: But what if the church damaged me?
John: Go to church.
O: But what if people hurt me at one point?
J: Go to church.
O: But what if I feel like I connect more with God in nature than with people in the church?
J: Go to church.
O: But what if I…
J: [interjects] Are you dying?
O: No.
J: Are you imprisoned?
O: No…
J: Is there anything prohibiting you from going to church?
O: Well, I feel like…
J: [interjects again] You can’t love God without loving His people and loving His people means that you die to self, bear with one another in love, and obey the commands of Scripture for your personal and corporate edification, in order that God might be glorified. Go. To. Church.

While the church can often be a motley group, Christ has enduring patience with His bride. His death accomplished her redemption, yet we live in this eschatological tension wherein we still sin against one another. In the love of the brethren, sin can be properly dealt with through a biblical, disciplinary process, or simply in overlooking the offense of a brother or sister whose actions are not indicative of normal behavior. In similar character to our Savior, we must be willing to bear with one another, in love and patience, as we are all progressively sanctified. I understand deep wounds can be caused – yet the Scriptures give us no option to withhold forgiveness from an individual, or forsake the assembling of God’s people. Summarily stated, loving God is inseparable from loving those within the household of faith. You cannot demonstrate a love for the brethren by abdicating from fellowship with and participation in service to one another.

Grayson Gilbert, Patheos 14 Comments [4/20/2017 1:31:05 AM]
Fundie Index: 6

Quote# 126440

Sermon 2: Purity and Chastity
By Rev. William H. Grimes
It's time that we discuss a very important chapter in the Bible: I Corinthians 7. I Corinthians 7 talks about married life and the single life. Liberal theologians take this passage as meaning that there is inherent value in marriage, and that marriage is better than being single. The command to "be fruitful and multiply" was ONLY for the immediate descendants of Adam and Eve. It was NOT meant to be a command in 2017! Yet people are breeding like rabbits! Fornicators such as US President Donald Trump are partially to blame for the emulation of wicked behaviors because in the eyes of the Lord Trump was never married, thus guilty of fornication, and his current "marriage" with Melania Trump is an adulterous affair!
I Corinthians 7:1 says that "Now concerning the things whereof ye wrote unto me: It is good for a man not to touch a woman." Clear as crystal, plain as day! Yet these liberals are insistent upon theological sloppiness. IT IS GOOD FOR A MAN NOT TO TOUCH A WOMAN. What in the world do you think that means besides the fact that IT IS GOOD FOR A MAN NOT TO TOUCH A WOMAN?! Can Paul articulate this point any clearer?! Are you liberals dense?!!!
I Corinthians 7:8 likewise states "I say therefore to the unmarried and widows, it is good for them if they abide even as I." Even the liberal NIV says that "Now to the unmarried and the widows I say: It is good for them to stay unmarried, as I do." If even the liberal pro-abortion virgin birth denying NIV can be correct about this crucial issue, what is the excuse of these scores of other liberals who do not recognize the fact that this passage says that it is not good for a man to touch a woman, and that it is BETTER for men to stay unmarried and live lives of celibacy?
Liberals love to clap back with the following verse, which says "But if they cannot contain, let them marry: for it is better to marry than to burn." However, this does NOT say that most or all men should marry. Only men who absolutely lack self control and cannot remain chaste and then fall into fornication shall marry. A very different concept, right?! These men are seen as weaker in the Kingdom of God, and they get less reward in heaven for they had the reward of sexual gratification on Earth. Heaven has treasures far beyond the simple and fleeting pleasure of sexual gratification, and sexual gratification is completely unnecessary for humans, and people live fine lives and accomplish great things without it. Christian Sir Isaac Newton was one of the most brilliant minds that God has blessed this world with, and he never desired sexual gratification and lived a life of excellence for God and also his fellow man. This is what we need to set kids up for, not for ignoring God in favor of sexual gratification, marriage, and childrearing! It takes up a lot of time that could be spent worshiping God instead!
Back to the Trump situation, this chapter also says that "And unto the married I command, yet not I, but the Lord, Let not the wife depart from her husband: But and if she depart, let her remain unmarried or be reconciled to her husband: and let not the husband put away his wife. But to the rest speak I, not the Lord: If any brother hath a wife that believeth not, and she be pleased to dwell with him, let him not put her away. And the woman which hath an husband that believeth not, and if he be pleased to dwell with her, let her not leave him."(I Corinthians 7:10-13) Donald Trump "married" Ivana Trump, but that was even a sham marriage because she is still married to Alfred Winklmayr, who she "divorced" right before marrying Trump, and after Ivana divorced Donald, she had two more "marriages" and "divorces" that are shams unto the Lord, as Ivana is still married to Alfred! Since Ivana has never reconciled with Alfred, and Donald has never been validly married in the eyes of the Lord, Donald is guilty of fornication and Ivana is an adultress! "First Lady" Melania Trump is "married" to Donald Trump in the eyes of the world, and Melania is nothing but a porn star and a trophy wife who has never glorified the Lord! Say what else you want about Michelle Obama, but at least she had some class and dignity, and was not an adulteress! Such a sinful and wicked and prideful man the "godly" have elected to lead the USA! Woe to America! Melania Trump is WICKED AND DECEITFUL AND SINFUL AND LACKS CLASS AND DIGNITY BECAUSE SHE HATES THE THINGS OF GOD AND LOVES MAMMON!!!!!!!!!!!!!
To conclude, the wicked Americans need to WAKE UP and realize the sham that is excessive marriage and fornication and adultery because sexual gratification IS NOT A HUMAN RIGHT and Onanism and other forms of impurity are NOT FOR THE GODLY and marriage is only for WEAK MEN WHO CANNOT CONTAIN THEIR PASSION LEST THEY FALL INTO FORNICATION, and if you marry and have sexual exploits, YOU WILL BE A LESSER BEING IN THE KINGDOM OF HEAVEN PROVIDED YOU CAN BE A MAN WHO ONLY HAS ONE WIFE AND ONE LOVER! God's people said AMEN!

William Grimes, New Testament Baptist Church 72 Comments [4/19/2017 12:14:50 AM]
Fundie Index: 7

Quote# 125894

Say you have a woman right. And you catch her fucking off with another man. You'll be ready to kill both of them. That's how the heavenly farther feels when you celebrate these pagan holidays. Spiritual fornication. You Israelites better repent (negroes, Latinos, native Americans)

Asar'el Ben Israel, Facebook 22 Comments [4/1/2017 8:40:38 AM]
Fundie Index: 7

Quote# 73099

The invisible hand of marriage is unseen force of productivity that results from the marriage of a man and woman.[1]

The invisible hand of marriage is more powerful and influential than the "invisible hand" identified by Adam Smith in economics. Indeed, the source of productivity from Smith's invisible hand has been erroneously attributed to purely economic considerations, without properly factoring in the productive force of marriage. Self-interest and greed are not the primary driving forces of the invisible hand, but marriage is.

Key elements of the invisible hand of marriage include:

* the powerful incentive to work for the benefit of someone else who needs your efforts, such as a spouse or child
* the motivation to work for a future that will likely extend beyond one's own life
* the checks and balances against unproductive activity, anxiety, depression and addiction, from the very different perspectives of a man and a woman
* the insights and wisdom that result from complementary outlooks by a man and woman in marriage
* the pushing and prodding, analogous to what a supervisor, coach or sergeant does, that encourages and compels people in marriage to achieve their best
* a division of labor that enables each spouse to work on what he or she does best

(add to or improve this list)

Same-sex marriage

There is no invisible hand of marriage if the spouses have the same gender. Virtually none of the above elements exist in same-sex marriage. Same-sex marriage is a recipe for unproductive activity, anxiety, depression and addition, with the enormously beneficial checks and balances provided by traditional marriage.

References

1. ? This concept was first discovered and developed on Conservapedia. When this entry was generated here, a Google search on "invisible hand of marriage" did not find a single reference on the internet: "No results found for 'invisible hand of marriage.'"

Andy Schlafly, Conservapedia, Essay:The Invisible Hand of Marriage 115 Comments [5/23/2010 6:07:10 PM]
Fundie Index: 128
Submitted By: Night Jaguar

Quote# 12325

Why in the hell do gays want to get married anyways?

Why can't they just fuck off and be happy they can live together and not get beaten like its the 1950s

Punishment, Ubersite 40 Comments [6/13/2006 12:00:00 AM]
Fundie Index: 3

Quote# 126503

Roy Moore, the chief justice of the Alabama Supreme Court, was a guest on Eagle Forum Live over the weekend, where he discussed the recent developments in marriage equality with Anne Cori, Phyllis Schlafly’s daughter.

Moore seemed to be thrown a little off guard when a listener called in and asked angrily why “people use the 14th Amendment to protect interracial marriage when the authors of the 14th Amendment were against interracial marriage.” (The Supreme Court has found bans on both same-sex and interracial marriages to be violations of the 14th Amendment.)

Cori interrupted the caller and asked Moore to instead address people who say “you have to agree with same-sex marriage because interracial marriage is okay.”

The difference, Moore said, is that the right to the “pursuit of happiness” found in the Declaration of Independence came from God and God supports interracial marriage but not same-sex marriage.

“I think people today would say that same-sex marriage is a pursuit of happiness,” Cori interjected.

“Well, they would say that, but that’s not the way the laws of God define the pursuit of happiness,” Moore responded. “And pursuit of happiness was given by God and recognized by the United States Supreme Court in 1967 in Loving v. Virginia.”

Of course, interracial marriage opponents at the time were quite certain that God opposed interracial marriage, which had lower levels of public support at the time Loving was decided than same-sex marriage does today.


roy moore, right wing watch 11 Comments [4/20/2017 11:32:49 AM]
Fundie Index: 4
Submitted By: Mister Spak

Quote# 126510

If you say your Christian, BUT you vote Democrat (or Independent with Democrat favor), you are most likely not a Christian at all. Being Christian and Democrat is like oil and water, they don't mix...

Eden Decoded, Facebook 17 Comments [4/20/2017 11:42:49 AM]
Fundie Index: 10

Quote# 126494

Fun Fact: The Best of People will Fight Them.

Another sign of the Khawarij. The best of people will fight them.

Let’s recap real quick, one side you have:

Every western country, every gulf country, every Arab country, and Israel. (Who btw have done nothing for any Muslims suffering since their cursed inception…but were quick to mobilize their fighter jets when The Khilafah was formed.)

In the other corner, you have:

Brothers and Sisters like you and me (who are far better then you and I, but just for the sake of this post) who made Hijrah, gave up everything for the sake of Allah swt, are fighting in the path of Allah swt, who don’t fear the blame of the blamer, stern and harsh with the disbelievers, and gentle with the believers.

Which one you think is going to be the camp of “best of people”? A Group with America, Iran, Russia, and Israel? Or a group who strives and established the Khilafah?

quranic-recitation, Tumblr 16 Comments [4/20/2017 1:37:42 AM]
Fundie Index: 6
Submitted By: Thanos6

Quote# 126483

Reminder that young innocent love is the single most important thing in life

And you will never experience it

even if you somehow get plastic surgery or whatever and ascend, it will be too late for you to enjoy your most important years

Vegeta_Da_Prince, /r/incels 15 Comments [4/19/2017 12:41:58 PM]
Fundie Index: 6
Submitted By: Pharaoh Bastethotep

Quote# 61443

[This is a pagan forum but texasdave is a Christian. He is explaining why Christianity is the true religion.]

The word " Lai" does mean come to Christ. The prophecies of Christ go back to the beginning of time itself. Before 220 BC. God probably orchestrated the Chinese language to facillitate the Gospel for this time now. You know, 3000 Chinese are coming to Christ every day through the underground church. It is wonderful and that word is helping. Praise God.


texasdave, Mind and Magick 40 Comments [4/15/2009 6:06:23 PM]
Fundie Index: 36
Submitted By: shadowraven

Quote# 111257

If Catholicism is going to be honored, then it's a bit unfair not to honor other pagan religions. At least Hinduism doesn't claim to be Christianity. Catholicism is more of a danger to the Truth than Hinduism. Many people who reject Catholicism also automatically believe that Protestantism is Truth, but this is a misguided belief, not Faith.

Those who know Jesus (the) Christ have His seal in them. While pagan religions, humanism, and varying forms of fake Christianity flourish in the world, God is saving people by the power of His Holy Spirit and transforming us with His Word.

Follow Jesus, find Truth.

FoJC_Forever, Christian News Network 27 Comments [7/29/2015 3:11:35 AM]
Fundie Index: 16

Quote# 29357

<<From a Brief Bio of - Paul Abramson Editor of: www.creationism.org>>

Evolution is primarily a spiritual deception. There is still no scientific evidence to support it; there are actually zero transitional fossils, no evolutionary mechanism (it's not mutations!), and their dating methods just don't work! (Simultaneously they ignore the Earth dating methods that do work, that show a young planet Earth.) Informed creationists usually win debates against highly "educated/indoctrinated" evolutionary professors ... ... even a layman like Paul.



Paul Abramson , creationism.org 52 Comments [9/27/2007 3:46:30 PM]
Fundie Index: 11
Submitted By: Jeremy PC

Quote# 7793

['Is it ok to lie for God']

yes. the main goal should be to save people from hell. this is accomplished when they accept Jesus as their savior, and that should be done any means necessary..

AngryNotice, Christian Forums 27 Comments [9/7/2005 12:00:00 AM]
Fundie Index: 6

Quote# 3790

I wonder is anyone interested in discussing science in here. I dont think I'll get any argument that science is a human invention, even though it is worshiped and served like a pagan god.

Oholiab, Christian Forums 5 Comments [8/1/2003 12:00:00 AM]
Fundie Index: 4

Quote# 107437

Could fashion magazines be the cause of atheism?
in the bible it says God made man in his own image. When atheists look in the mirror and see what they look like maybe they don't think much of God at all. Also when they get to see people in magazines they must think even less of themselves so they end up thinking even less of God. At school a lot of the atheists are feminists and they are always complaining and one of the things i heard them say was fashion magazines were bad for their self esteem. In the old days there weren't magazines so people didn't know they were not very pretty and maybe that could explain why atheism is increasing.

anonymous, Y! answers 33 Comments [3/29/2015 10:23:16 AM]
Fundie Index: 17

Quote# 123290

FOUR TYPES OF MALES

There are basically four types of males or male mating strategies in the world.

ALPHA MALES

General description: These are dominant, strong men who are usually the leaders. Their intelligence and morality are less important but must have at least average intelligence and are often quite intelligent. Alphas are men like a Fortune 500 CEO, mafia leader like Tony Soprano or statesmen like Vladimir Putin.

Mating strategy: The way these males reproduce is by dominance/high status/strength.

Examples: a strong king, warrior etc (in the past), strong mafia leader, statesman, CEO of a Fortune 500 company

BETA MALES

General description: Weaker than alphas. Not suited for leadership positions. Providers. Their intelligence and morality are less important and while they’re almost always of average to good morality they don’t think about morality much. Their role as a provider requires them to usually have at least average intelligence.

Mating strategy: These men offer their resources for female emotional and sexual fidelity.

Examples: A good foot-soldier, worker, employee

OMEGA MALES

General description: Weakest type. They lack the respect of other men, except the most superficial “respect” from fellow idiots so they’re not fit to lead any organization aspiring for success. They are of low morals and often low intelligence. They don’t necessarily have to be stupid, but they are always immoral. However, since stupid omegas won’t care about child support they also won’t care about contraception, which means they will have as many children as they can. This means that being a stupid omega is currently the best type in terms of reproduction.

Mating strategy: These men use seduction. Their lack morals and often poor intelligence means they’re not fit for long-term relationships. Their evolutionary advantage is their immorality. Since they’re despised by all other types and are not in any alliance with them they will not hesitate to seduce other men’s girlfriends and wives.

Examples: Throughout most of history/ in societies that aren’t omega societies – a conniving man with a bad reputation for seducing women.

In omega societies/many current societies (and practically all Western ones) – an immoral, stupid deadbeat who gets women due to being a moron. For example, a PUA but not just them. Most men today are omegas.

COALPHA MALES

General description: Weaker than alphas but stronger than betas and omegas. Their possess a high level of intelligence and morality. But the fact that they’re smarter than betas is even a sort a hindrance to them in a modern society, as these men won’t be foolish enough to support a used up slut in her 30s and her child so no women will want them at all (I will explain why later).

Mating strategy: Mating strategies of these men depend on the kind of society they found themselves into, which will be explained very soon. In alpha societies these men are usually in position very similar to betas but if the alpha society hold values like intelligence and morality in relatively high regard they might be more attractive to women due to these qualities. But, their best mating strategy is to form a coalpha group, which assimilates both alphas and betas into a monogamous society where each man has a single wife and excludes omegas.

Examples: leading class in the golden periods of Athens, Roman Republic, England 1500-1800 AD, early USA, members of CoAlpha forums, any man with high intelligence and morals who wants increased co-operation between men.

caamib, CoAlphaAntiModernistIncelBlogger 55 Comments [12/28/2016 2:08:01 AM]
Fundie Index: 11
Submitted By: Pharaoh Bastethotep

Quote# 126462

I have a very extremely psychotic Electra complex. And, I’ve found Jesus as my Super Sugar Daddy. Jesus and I already make a deal. He owns my body. And, Jesus is really hot, gorgeous, young, muscular, tight, in His glorious Immortal Body. No wrinkles. And, the real ultra-richest one. And, Jesus is so qualified as my Super Sugar Daddy. He absolutely can eat me if He wants. I’m gotta put myself on a silver platter and dedicate myself to Him in the first night of our wedding. I’m the little hottest, wildest immortal cat boy that belongs to Jesus, and He can do anything He wants when we’re really on the bed just in case He wanna eat me. I have an immortal Twister Tongue.

Usachinanukewar, Wordpress 21 Comments [4/19/2017 9:37:34 AM]
Fundie Index: 11

Quote# 58525

[About FSTDT with the (old?) Admin's answers in bold.]

What is the goal of this site? Entertainment.
I guess it is entertaining to have a site that is 90% geared towards the hate of Christians. Even up to implying that they should be killed just for what they believe.

I don't get a lot of non-Christian submissions. Non-Christian quotes just don't get submitted to the site very often at all.
Which shows that your members are basically Atheists, and Satanists like yourself.

I allow people to say anything, I operate my site using a principle of minimal moderation.
Regardless of how many excuses you make for your sites content. What you allow on your site shapes what your site has become. If killing Christians is entertainment, then allowing it to be said is what you condone. Having the ability to delete comments like this on your site, but not choosing to because "you allow people to say anything" attitude. Is allowing, and approving what you actually think. Because when someone actually carries out what you allow on your site (killing people for what they believe), I'd like to see if you can get off the hook by using one of the lame excuses you use here. There is nothing you can say that will ever justify murder.

No one would care what fundies say if it weren't for the fact that they are trying to roll back civil rights in this country, rewrite the whole of history to fit their little pet theories about the universe, make a mockery of science by trying to justify ice-canopy theories, hydroplate theories, flood geology, and geocentricism.
So your goal of all this is a type of mind control? Where your way of thinking is the only way everyone should think? Because to do what you say above, it would take an established dictatorship that puts out information that only supports it's views (your views). And stifles all other views even up to killing those who would disagree. Even Hitler tried to do this. If what you believe were truly about free thought. You would not care what I think, or anyone else. The term free thinker is just a cover up for the mind control you want to havem over everyone. Because free thinking is a part of freedom. I see no freedom in thinking that anyone who does not go along with your ideas, should be ridiculed, or even killed. Maybe that's the real reason you allow people to say: We should kill Christians. Deep inside, it's what you want. So you let other people say it for you.

So is the mockery of science your justification for murder? Because every excuse I see by people like yourself, always boils down to science and evolution. And killing for evolution always connects to Hitler. And will be the reason I will always make that connection as long as sites like yours, and other condone killing.

Issac, Y.E.C. Headquarters 57 Comments [2/11/2009 4:01:00 PM]
Fundie Index: 10
Submitted By: DevilsChaplain

Quote# 7065

The big banf causes chaos, not order. make sure there i snothing in your house and just wait for the newest flat screen TV to pop out. then try waiting for 10000 years if it does not appear. Because the blind faith necessary for the evolutionary process to be believable is to wait 250 million years.

Xinhong, Christianity.com Forums 13 Comments [4/1/2004 12:00:00 AM]
Fundie Index: 3

Quote# 126507

Thanks, I actually missed talking to you and our other friends when I had to lay around with my foot propped up! Oh, It makes me so indignant when I hear people say "Birds are the closest living relatives to dinosaurs!" Kentucky Fried T-Rex? I think not!! They even faked fossils to have feathers to prove their point(not the first time that was attempted, either,as in the case of the infamous "Piltdown Man")And it is true that "fowl" in the Biblical sense is a broader term than how we define it now.Just as some other herbivores are called "cattle"not just bovines.

galacticdragon , Deviantart 16 Comments [4/20/2017 11:33:56 AM]
Fundie Index: 6
Submitted By: P.E.T.F

Quote# 7077

IT IS AMERICA'S CHRISTIAN DUTY TO SUPPORT ISRAEL IN PALESTINE FOR ITS RIGHT TO EXIST. HOWEVER, MAN'S POLITICS WILL NOT BRING PEACE TO THE HOLY LAND. ONLY WHEN ALL THE JEWS AND MUSLIMS THERE HAVE BEEN CONVERTED TO CHRISTIANITY WILL THERE BE PEACE IN JERUSALEM! THE US GOV'T SHOULD BE WORKING TO CHRISTIANIZE ALL THESE WARRING JEWS AND MUSLIMS IN PALESTINE TO BRING LASTING PEACE THERE.

MR. TOMATOE HEAD, Biblical Pitfalls 10 Comments [4/1/2004 12:00:00 AM]
Fundie Index: 3

Quote# 126461

By the way, IF we wanna talk about the anal sex, I’m absolutely and definitely and always a virgin boy. I have a virgin ass without being penetrated by any earthly man with 6-packs and a gigantic penis. I’m a good holy boy with a virgin ass. And, tell all of you a secret. Someone loved my ass, but this someone was a SHE, not a HE. She loved my ass, and when we had sex, she always loved grabbing my ass, because she deemed my ass was so adorable and cute and sexy and TIGHT. My earthly ass was really really really tight when I was in my early 20’s. I miss my tight ass so much. But, anyway, I’m gotta have a very extremely hot and gorgeous immortal ass with IMMORTAL TIGHTNESS very soon in the Church Rapture. I’m gotta love my immortal ass so much for eternity. And, only Jesus can grab my ass in my eternal life.

Usachinanukewar, Wordpress 11 Comments [4/19/2017 9:37:31 AM]
Fundie Index: 7

Quote# 126448

I think the difference is a matter of degree. You say you're very pro 2nd Amendment, and yet you're willing to tolerate a candidate that pushes for an 'assault weapon' ban.

"We need to get the military style assault weapons off of our streets" is right next to "We need to exterminate the Jews" in my handbook of 'Absolutely unacceptable beliefs

Telconi, NationStates 24 Comments [4/19/2017 12:24:15 AM]
Fundie Index: 10

Quote# 126439

Erdogan is not from the Muslims due to his actions, even tho he claims to be, however Turkey is a country of Muslims. So if our brothers and sisters come a step closer to their freedom and establishing the Shari'ah once again, without fighting, how can anyone hate this? People who are incompetent and unable to understand or comprehend such simple matters should not get involved in politics

ibnharb, Tumblr 6 Comments [4/19/2017 12:14:44 AM]
Fundie Index: 3
Submitted By: Thanos6
1 2 3 4 5 10 15 20 25 40 | top