Quote# 129907

I guess the question's purpose is mostly to tackle the assumptions of Christians who prefer a pluralistic society over a theocracy. I understand theocracies have failed repeatedly throughout history, but if the intention of the Church is to be in communion with God, shouldn't our government be that way also? Even if we attempt to have a theocracy in America and fail, wouldn't that be better than a democratic society based on the popular opinion of heretics, apostates, & infidels?

ExodusMe, Christian Forums 14 Comments [7/29/2017 12:06:04 PM]
Fundie Index: 4

Quote# 44340

Theocracy

Rule by God himself, or through his chosen representatives. This is THE perfect governent type, perfect justice and equity flourish.

[...]

With Theocracy, or Christianity in general, it is the exact opposite of communism in every single way possible. Where the Individual matters just as much as the group.

A Theocracy promotes goodness and righteousness, and free-thinking as well. A communistic government allows no free thinking, it is ruthless and cruel with its people. It is truly an evil type of government that looks to destroy Christianity, or other types of beliefs.

[...]

For a look into a glimpse of what would happen if communism would be allowed to happen in America, check out the book 1984.

There has only been one true theocracy in world history, that of ancient Israel. Where God mediated his law through Moses and the priesthood. All national decisions were in the hand of God.

Not Zane, Urban Dictionary 53 Comments [8/6/2008 1:18:01 PM]
Fundie Index: 5
Submitted By: Doctor Fishcake

Quote# 4990

That's good because you won't [see an admission of incorrectness]... Admiting you are wrong is explicitly and strictly for sin and repentence.

hope's daughter, Internet Infidels 5 Comments [10/1/2003 12:00:00 AM]
Fundie Index: 3

Quote# 129901

What is wrong with guilt and shame? Your child should know that masturbation shameful because it is. How else are they going to learn this if you don't explicitly tell them? Why should alienating the child be avoided more so than stopping the act of masturbation?

Are you afraid the child will rebel once he turns 18 and turn into a promiscuous heathen when he meets the "real world"? This is possible, but he certainly would be worse off hitting the "real world" with mortal sin having stained his soul.

However, if you are vigilant and strictly correct him before he becomes addicted to it, he will greatly respect you when he grows older and continues to discover the beauty of chastity and purity. He will think, "Wow, although I didn't realize it at the time, my parents really cared for me!"

Geremia, Catholic Answers Forum 16 Comments [7/29/2017 8:01:51 AM]
Fundie Index: 6
Submitted By: Katie

Quote# 129792

Yes, great news. Transgenderism is a mental disorder and should be treated like it. We cannot have folks in the military battling their own demons when trying to battle Americas. We need to call it like it is.

Furthermore, homosexuality is a mental disorder as well. Doesn’t mean we should trample their rights to life, liberty and pursuit of happiness, but we shouldn’t act as if it is normal. It is not.

It is against God, but even if you didn’t believe in God, it is against natural law. If anyone disputes this fact, present them with another. If all of civilization decided to turn to homosexuality rather than natural relations, that civilization will after a period of time cease to exist thus halting all homosexuality. Pretty simple really.

servantboy777, Free Republic 16 Comments [7/27/2017 3:36:18 AM]
Fundie Index: 5
Submitted By: Katie

Quote# 129738

Lady Checkmate's headline: "Signs of Demon Possession?: Non-binary gender-neutral pronouns"

My heart broke as I read that the enemy has manipulated the lost into addressing confused people that struggle with sexual immorality, individually (single person) as "they" (plural). The unclean demon-possessed man in the tombs in Gadarenes was identified in the plural form because he was possessed by a legion of demons. Why would a normal rationale person address a single person in plural form? Demon possession...

Thank God that He (God) heals broken hearts and that His word is true. The GOOD NEWS is that Jesus Christ delivered the demon-possessed man and so there is hope in Jesus Christ for those who are caught up in sexual immorality (homosexuality, those who demand to be addressed as something/someone else other than what they are, etc.):
Mark 5:1-20 (KJV)

5 And they came over unto the other side of the sea, into the country of the Gadarenes.
2 And when he was come out of the ship, immediately there met him out of the tombs a man with an unclean spirit,
3 Who had his dwelling among the tombs; and no man could bind him, no, not with chains:
4 Because that he had been often bound with fetters and chains, and the chains had been plucked asunder by him, and the fetters broken in pieces: neither could any man tame him.
5 And always, night and day, he was in the mountains, and in the tombs, crying, and cutting himself with stones.
6 But when he saw Jesus afar off, he ran and worshipped him,
7 And cried with a loud voice, and said, What have I to do with thee, Jesus, thou Son of the most high God? I adjure thee by God, that thou torment me not.
8 For he said unto him, Come out of the man, thou unclean spirit.
9 And he asked him, What is thy name? And he answered, saying, My name is Legion: for we are many.
10 And he besought him much that he would not send them away out of the country.
11 Now there was there nigh unto the mountains a great herd of swine feeding.
12 And all the devils besought him, saying, Send us into the swine, that we may enter into them.
13 And forthwith Jesus gave them leave. And the unclean spirits went out, and entered into the swine: and the herd ran violently down a steep place into the sea, (they were about two thousand;) and were choked in the sea.
14 And they that fed the swine fled, and told it in the city, and in the country. And they went out to see what it was that was done.
15 And they come to Jesus, and see him that was possessed with the devil, and had the legion, sitting, and clothed, and in his right mind: and they were afraid.
16 And they that saw it told them how it befell to him that was possessed with the devil, and also concerning the swine.
17 And they began to pray him to depart out of their coasts.
18 And when he was come into the ship, he that had been possessed with the devil prayed him that he might be with him.
19 Howbeit Jesus suffered him not, but saith unto him, Go home to thy friends, and tell them how great things the Lord hath done for thee, and hath had compassion on thee.
20 And he departed, and began to publish in Decapolis how great things Jesus had done for him: and all men did marvel.

Don't forget to RECOMMEND. Lets get the Truth out so that Light may shine bright in this dark place and Jesus Christ may be glorified.Even if the discussion is closed, please still RECOMMEND.



Lady Checkmate, Disqus - Faith & Religion 12 Comments [7/27/2017 1:49:21 PM]
Fundie Index: 5
Submitted By: Jocasta

Quote# 129869

Yes, the first thing is to "love God with all your heart and soul", then the rest follows.

Also I just want to say that I have actually been in reparative therapy. They do not "zap you" that is kind of a reference to early attempts at therapy done I don't even know how long ago. The therapy now has evolved and (if it is not outlawed) will continue to evolve, to build upon the desire to turn toward whatever heterosexual functionality a person has (most even gay men have some) and learn creative and even pleasant ways of turning away from same-sex fantasies, and making that turning away from evil a sort of routine habit that becomes "second nature". I have heard the analogy of ruts in a dirt road applied.

The more you drive through the rut with porn or even homosexual fantasy that you voluntarily stick with and daydream about, the deeper the rut gets. But if you learn to turn away from that "rut" and stay out of it as much as possible, God can and will fill in those ruts to some extent. It is different for everyone. Some have a sort of bisexuality, others have deep-seated homosexuality to the point where they are repulsed by heterosexuality. But avoiding inappropriate sexual thoughts and filling our minds with scripture and other good thoughts is key.

Lastly I just want to say that despite all God did for them, some of the Israelites ACTUALLY DID want to return to Egypt! It's a great lesson for us.

westNwewaxation, Catholic Answers Forum 7 Comments [7/28/2017 2:27:14 PM]
Fundie Index: 5
Submitted By: Katie

Quote# 129884

Obama was exactly what modern liberals and atheists were waiting for. A way to openly hate religion. He promoted it while trying to convinced us he was Christian. You don’t sit in the “church” he sat in for 20 years, marry the thing he did, promote Islam at every turn and to allow so many Islamic groups into the people’s White House and promote and support all the Muslims he possibly could while bowing to a Saudi King. He rarely attended church. Why? We’re the rumors true he had his own little mosque in OUR White House and prayed there instead? He had a Mao decoration bulb on a WH Christmas tree.
He demanded Christian colleges to cover religious icons to be covered before his arrival. He told us this was no longer a Christian nation, but an Islamic nation. He surrounded himself with like minded people and they grew in strength.
He created the perfect storm for people all over the world to deny Christ.
He was exactly what many had been wanting for years.
Christianity was already in a decline and the last 8 years was no help.

Glenn47, Fellowship of the Minds 9 Comments [7/29/2017 7:58:06 AM]
Fundie Index: 4
Submitted By: DiarrheaMan

Quote# 129886

Alma | June 24, 2017 at 8:47 am | Reply

Salem 1692, more than 200 people were accused of practicing witchcraft—the Devil’s magic. 2017 Vogue is urging women to be witches, sorry, I think they mean “bitches” say Miley, Madonna, Rosie O’butch, etc. DUMP VOGUE, donate the money to abused women.

Alma, Fellowship of the Minds 3 Comments [7/29/2017 7:58:27 AM]
Fundie Index: 5
Submitted By: DiarrheaMan

Quote# 129842

I’ve been receiving an increasing frequency of emails from gaystream media whores soliciting this blog’s lordship for a roll in the clickbait hay. All of them, to date, have requested absolute privacy (the irony), so I won’t divulge details on threat of (((legal))) recriminations, but I can offer a general impression of what they’re asking. For instance, one media whore speaking on behalf of a well-known whoresite is part of a team putting together a piece of agitprop art on the manosphere and wanted CH’s scintillating contribution to the effort.

I’ve wondered for a few months how best to respond to these inquiries. So far, the CH policy has been to ignore and plow. No j/k, it’s been to ignore. Period. I never respond, partly because, what’s the use? I won’t persuade a shriek of shitlibs to accept in their hearts the Rude Word of the Chateau, and I certainly can’t expect to be treated fairly by these toads. More practically, I am very careful to guard my shadowy dimensions, and there is a risk, however muted through multiple proxies and TOR nodes, that a reply by me would be scoured for identifying info by a black ops team at Fusion GPS (stands for Grabbing Pussy Systems).

[Your name is James Weidmann, you're a former DC-area FINRA employee, your pic is easily findable by anyone with google and rudimentary knowledge of how you've been had almost a decade ago]

But the inquiries are getting more insistent and coming from bigger and bigger names. So I’m reconsidering my standard policy of ignoring them; perhaps for an upgrade to a “lol suck a dik” response? I have toyed with the idea of a conditional reply. That is, I set the ground rules and they swear by them in writing before I offer any penetrating insights of my tumescent wisdom.

For instance, we all know leftoid gutter filth can’t help litter their reporting of deplorable subjects with smear terms and baseless slander. One can’t hold a gun to reporters’ heads (yet) to demand honest and accurate journalism, but one can bind them to abide at least a rudimentary schedule of fair play. I believe two of the Original Shitposters, weev and Anglin, have a lot to say about this tactic when dealing with the globohomogenized media and their skypistry.

For instance, I would demand any reporter refrain from using the term “White supremacy” in any article about Chateau Heartiste, and if needed for context to substitute the term “White competency”. Similarly, they would be required by the CH Vajeena Convention rule 69, subsection 14.88, to replace the word “racist” with “totally rad race realist”. And “misogynist” would become “man who doesn’t bow and scrape before delusional feminist cunts”.

Any violations of the terms of agreement would result in an immediate public shaming and an army of weaponized autistes leaving pig entrails on the reporter’s super zip front door.

And, to punctuate my seriousness of intent, neither would the reporter be permitted to insert a disclaimer that contained the words “white supremacy”, “white supremacist”, “racist”, “misogynist” or other favored term of othering the leftoid equalism cuntsortium employs to maintain their icy grip on their quack Narrative.

I throw my quandary to the studio audience. What do you think is the best way forward to deal with slithery solicitations from Snakes and Merchants of Fake?

CH, Chateau Heartiste 12 Comments [7/28/2017 7:40:05 AM]
Fundie Index: 5

Quote# 129900

The full Catholic teaching on masturbation seems to be a secret to most people.

It is a challenging teaching.

But because this teaching calls us to live in a fully human way, it’s good news!

“Is masturbation wrong?”

Yes. The Catholic teaching on masturbation says that masturbation is always morally wrong.

Sex is intended to be both an expression of love for your spouse, and a beautiful means of procreation.

Sex is so special, powerful, and valuable that it is properly used only within marriage. If you’re not married, you should abstain from sexual activity.

I know: this is all very counter-cultural.

The truth sometimes is!

Sex is the ultimate gift husbands and wives can give: a total gift of self, body and soul. Sex is how you fulfill your wedding vows to love totally, freely, and completely. As long as you both shall live. The secret of life is hidden in that intimate sharing.

The Catholic teaching on masturbation says that masturbation denies every aspect of that promise of sex — of that promise of your vows!

Masturbation is:

Focused on yourself
A withholding from your spouse
A statement that sex is only about pleasure — your own pleasure
Inherently sterile
Often accompanied by “adultery in your heart” through pornography and fantasy
Catholics don’t condemn masturbation just because of some lofty idea of what the natural purpose of sex is. We speak the truth about the harm it does to people.

That is the true reason for the Catholic teaching on masturbation: it denies the meaning of sex. It makes you less than fully human.

“But everyone else says masturbation is healthy!”

Yes, they do.

The world has a way of saying that a lot of disordered things are “good”.

Masturbation is radically self-centered, and radically un-Christian. That’s why the Catholic teaching on masturbation says it’s wrong. It turns us and our sexuality away from God and toward ourselves by:

Training our sexuality in the habit of self-indulgence, not self-giving
Divorcing the pleasure of orgasm from union with the “other”, your spouse
Turning away from the risks of loving another
Refusing fertility & the full responsibility of sex
I know — many educators and health professionals seem to be having a love affair with self-centered, self-indulgent sexuality. Why that is, I don’t know.

They’re wrong. They’re not telling you the truth about sex, about yourself, or about life.

You and your sexuality are worth more than you can imagine.

The Catholic teaching on masturbation is centered on a virtue called chastity. It means giving sexuality its proper place in our lives. Not snuffing it out, but not giving it free reign. A proper place. Chastity is one of the Fruits of the Holy Spirit. (See Catechism, 2337 - 2359)

The deep truth of the Catholic teaching on masturbation is confirmed by the enormous damage this so-called “private” act causes in people’s lives and marriages. Large numbers of men and women are starting to name their habit of masturbation for what it is: sexual addiction.

If we tell our teens that masturbation is normal and healthy, we’re setting them up with a habit that can yield a lifetime of difficulty. We’re telling them that self-indulgence and lack of self-control are positive things. This cannot form a strong foundation for mature, loving sexuality.

How is that either loving or healthy?

This talk of habit raises an important point: when is masturbation a sin? And how bad a sin is it?

The Catholic teaching on masturbation says that masturbation is a grave sin, what we call a mortal sin, by which we reject God’s offer of life.

However, Catholic morality also acknowledges that the force of habit can reduce or even eliminate our responsibility for our actions.

We have to freely consent in order to be fully responsible.
If a habit makes something less than a free choice, it also reduces our responsibility for our actions.
This does not give us free reign if we just call something a habit! Sinful actions still harm us greatly, even if we may not be fully charged with the guilt of committing them.

We have a responsibility to seek help and diligently strive to overcome our habits.

The Lord is patient & merciful. He desperately wants to free us from the slavery of sin. But we have to do our part, too.

If you think you’re trapped in the habit of masturbation or one of its close cousins (pornography, infidelity, prostitution, etc.), seek the competent help of a priest who supports the Church’s sexual morality, and specifically the Catholic teaching on masturbation. (Don’t be shy! They’ve heard it all before. Sadly, it’s quite common.)

beginningCatholic, beginningCatholic 7 Comments [7/29/2017 8:01:39 AM]
Fundie Index: 5
Submitted By: Katie

Quote# 129881

Pat Robertson has warned single mothers, that they’ll go to hell if they aren’t forced to get married.

The 700 Club host got a question from a father who has been actively trying to force his daughter to marry the father of her child, even though she has been through two divorces and doesn’t want to marry for a third time.

“My daughter has been living with a man for 3 years and has a baby with him,” viewer Mark wrote in an email. “She has told her kids that they are married but she won’t marry him because she has had 2 husbands already.”
Robertson believes that all women should be forced to marry, have babies, and cook and clean. Without even having met the viewer’s daughter, Robertson assumed that her relationship issues are due to a bad upbringing and that she must be rebellious instead of being submissive to the man in her life.

“I don’t know what kind of bringing up she had, but she didn’t have a very good one. A couple of marriages already? She is obviously undisciplined, rebellious, she can’t hold a stable relationship. And now she won’t enter into one even though she’s got a child by this man.”

Pat Robertson said that single mothers are asking to be sent to hell by remaining unmarried. The con artist also dared to presume what God would do to mothers who choose to stay single.

“She’s tempting God. I mean, man. She is walking on the edge. You think Wallenda was taking a chance? She’s really on a tightrope. I’d warn her because she’s asking for it. It’s going to be really tough. It’s easier to ask for forgiveness than permission — that’s a big joke. Not when you’re dealing with the Lord. Sooner or later, God’s going to say, ‘That’s all she wrote, baby.’ And it’s going to be tough.”

Pat Robertson, Nova Magazine 8 Comments [7/29/2017 7:57:25 AM]
Fundie Index: 7

Quote# 129726

There is no friendship between a muslim and kafir, it is impermissible. how can you have love for one who doesnt love Allah swt? by all means show kindnesses and invite to Islam, but as for taking them as a friend, eating with them, asking from them, joking with them and having alliance in any way is clearly impermissible. As mg says, you may on the face of things get on but you dont know what is in their hearts, never will a kafir love a muslim, never, not if you are truly upon the haq, but they may indulge a munafiq (not referring to you fa), even in my family, i can tell deep down in peoples hearts there is not love for the muslims, May Allah swt guide them to the straight path,there is emnity and disavowal between us, as Prophet Ibrahim (as), says in Qur'an, until the last day, this is clear manifest proof of the issue.

Umar`, Ummah 6 Comments [7/27/2017 1:49:08 PM]
Fundie Index: 6
Submitted By: Katie

Quote# 129898

In last year’s Brexit referendum, Jeremy Corbyn carried the baton for the City of London and trampled on his working-class and minority supporters by campaigning to remain in the EU. Crime hasn’t paid. Corbyn may have capitulated, but the Blairites will be satisfied by nothing short of his political annihilation. As New Labour’s prince of darkness Lord Peter Mandelson ranted at a 20 February Jewish Chronicle event: “Why do you want to just walk away and pass the title deeds of this great party over to someone like Jeremy Corbyn? I don’t want to, I resent it, and I work every single day in some small way to bring forward the end of his tenure in office.”

The bourgeoisie and its Blairite agents despise Corbyn for his talk of socialism, his support to trade union rights and his stated support for unilateral nuclear disarmament. In the eyes of the imperialist rulers, Corbyn’s opposition to the Trident nuclear missile system in particular makes him unfit to govern. On Remembrance Sunday in 2015, the head of the armed forces, General Sir Nicholas Houghton, made that view clear in a thinly veiled coup threat during an appearance on the Andrew Marr show.

Mandelson and the rest of the cabal led by Tony Blair spent two decades trying to transform Labour into an outright capitalist party. They abandoned even lip-service to socialism, abolished Clause IV and attempted to cut Labour’s ties to the unions. Corbyn’s election as Labour leader in September 2015, and his resounding re-election a year later, called the Blairite project into question. Driving the Blairites out of the Labour Party would constitute a step towards the political independence of the working class, despite the bankruptcy of Corbyn’s parliamentary reformist programme. For Marxists, it would offer an opportunity to expose the pretentions of the Labour lefts to speak for the working class. It would also further the struggle to win the most advanced workers and youth to the perspective of building a revolutionary workers party.

Corbyn continues to accommodate the Blairite agents of capital within Labour. Despite having the support of the majority of the party’s hundreds of thousands of members, Corbyn has not insisted on mandatory reselection of the despised Blairite MPs, or the removal of witch-hunting general secretary Iain McNicol. To avoid a split in the Parliamentary Labour Party last November, Corbyn and his allies John McDonnell and Diane Abbott absented themselves from Parliament during the vote on a motion by the Scottish National Party (SNP) calling for Blair to be held to account over the Iraq war. This unrequited peace offering was an offence against the hundreds of thousands of members who flooded into the Labour Party to support Corbyn, in large part driven by justified hatred for Tony Blair’s crimes.

The class war in the Labour Party poses the question: what type of party is needed to represent the interests of working people and the oppressed? The old Labour Party that is Corbyn’s model prided itself on being a “broad church”, meaning that it had room for a wide spectrum of political currents and opinions. Bloc affiliation of the trade unions to Labour ensured that the pro-capitalist union bureaucrats called the shots. In practice, such a “party of the whole class” necessarily submerges the most advanced layers of the working class into the most backward ones, with the result that the right wing dominates and the left bends to it for the sake of unity. Such parties are inevitably chauvinist, based on the dominant ethnic grouping and tied to the defence of the imperialist interests of their own ruling class. Corbyn’s leadership of Labour illustrates what that kind of party means in action — subordinating the needs of workers, immigrants and the oppressed to the likes of Tony Blair and his bourgeois cronies.

A Leninist vanguard party, in contrast, consists of the most politically advanced layers of the working class and oppressed, as well as elements of the petty bourgeoisie who have been won to the cause of proletarian revolution. A vanguard party would not tolerate the existence of pro-capitalist elements and English chauvinists in its ranks. It would champion the defence of immigrants, women and minorities, whose liberation must be tied to the proletariat’s struggle against capitalist class rule. Actually fulfilling the burning needs of working people and the oppressed cannot be achieved through a Labour majority in Parliament — it requires breaking the power of the capitalist exploiters through socialist revolution. To that end, the workers need their own steeled and tested combat party, modelled on the Bolshevik party of VI Lenin and Leon Trotsky, which led the working class to power in the Russian October Revolution of 1917!

Spartacist League of Britain, Spartacist League of Britain 4 Comments [7/29/2017 8:01:24 AM]
Fundie Index: 3
Submitted By: Katie

Quote# 129863

Lady Checkmate's headline: "The time has come for every red-blooded, God-loving patriot to sever ties with the Boy Scouts of America"

I absolutely agree with Todd. In fact, I personally stopped financially supporting them via their fundraisers (I would buy their popcorns, nuts, etc. at the booths outside of the stores) years ago when they decided to allow sexual immorality amongst their ranks. Their decision to put children at risk of being molested told me they didn't really care about the kids they were supposed to be helping and they didn't have Christian values.

The time has come for every red-blooded, God-loving patriot to sever ties with the Boy Scouts of America.

On Thursday the Boy Scouts (and those who identify as Boy Scouts) took it upon themselves to apologize for President Trump’s speech delivered to some 40,000 people at the National Scout Jamboree.

In doing so the leadership of the BSA has brought shame and disgrace upon what was once a storied and revered organization.

“I want to extend my sincere apologies to those in our Scouting family who were offended by the political rhetoric that was inserted into the jamboree. That was never our intent,” BSA Chief Scout Executive Michael Surbaugh wrote.

He went on to say the BSA regrets “that politics were inserted in the Scouting program.” You can read his entire screed by clicking here.

Who – exactly – was offended by the president’s remarks?


I wasn't offended in the least bit.

Don't forget to RECOMMEND. Lets get the Truth out so that Light may shine bright in this dark place and Jesus Christ may be glorified.Even if the discussion is closed, please still RECOMMEND.

http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2017/07/28/time-has-come-for-every-red-blooded-god-loving-patriot-to-sever-ties-with-boy-scouts-america.html

Lady Checkmate, Disqus - Faith & Religion 15 Comments [7/28/2017 9:41:32 AM]
Fundie Index: 4
Submitted By: Jocasta

Quote# 129875

WARNING: Don't take this chip implant because it could be the mark of the beast and if you take it you will be condemned to hell!.
Revelation 13:16 (King James Version) 16, And he [the AntiChrist] causeth all, both small and great, rich and poor, free and bond, to receive a mark in their right hand, or in their foreheads: And that no man might buy or sell, save he that had the mark, or the name of the beast, or the number of his name.

----------------------------------------­----------------------------------------­----------------

As I read page 1014 of H.R. 3590, it certainly seems like this health care reform bill includes a provision that discusses the potential for RFID implantable microchips. You can read the bill at this link. This provision speaks on the analysis of postmarket safety and outcomes data on various medical devices, including Class II devices.

The FDA has established standards for an implantable radiofrequency transponder systems (a/k/a RFID chips) that are Class II compliant (see above embedded document or on the FDA page). However, these RFID chips will have patient identification and health information. While the bill does not require mandatory RFID microchip implantation, it does establish an initial framework where the scope could be expanded with future legislation and regulation. For further information on one type of chip like this, see Microchip Implant Links All Medical Records, Credit History and Social Security Identification Numbers.

###

H.R. 3590 amends Section 519 of the Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C .360i). Here is the applicable language from H.R. 3590 (page 1,014):

(g)(1)The Secretary shall establish a national medical device registry (in this subsection referred to as the 'registry') to facilitate analysis of postmarket safety and outcomes data on each device that—
(A) is or has been used in or on a patient; and
(B) is—
(i) a class III device; or
(ii) a class II device that is implantable, life-supporting, or life-sustaining.

(2) In developing the registry, the Secretary shall, in consultation with the Commissioner of Food and Drugs, the Administrator of the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, the head of the Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology, and the Secretary of Veterans Affairs, determine the best methods for—

(A) including in the registry, in a manner consistent with subsection (f), appropriate information to identify each device described in paragraph (1) by type, model, and serial number or other unique identifier;

(B) validating methods for analyzing patient safety and outcomes data from multiple sources and for linking such data with the information included in the registry as described in subparagraph (A), including, to the extent feasible, use of—
(i) data provided to the Secretary under other provisions of this chapter; and
(ii) information from public and private sources identified under paragraph (3);

(C) integrating the activities described in this subsection with—
(i) activities under paragraph (3) of section 505(k) (relating to active postmarket risk identification);
(ii) activities under paragraph (4) of section 505(k) (relating to advanced analysis of drug safety data); and
(iii) other postmarket device surveillance activities of the Secretary authorized by this chapter; and...

3(B) In this paragraph, the term 'data' refers to information respecting a device described in paragraph (1), including claims data, patient survey data, standardized analytic files that allow for the pooling and analysis of data from disparate data environments, electronic health records, and any other data deemed appropriate by the Secretary.

Last Days Now!, Youtube 1 Comments [7/29/2017 7:55:57 AM]
Fundie Index: 3

Quote# 129897


Israel was to spread abroad to the West, East, North and South: "And thy seed shall be as the dust of the earth, and thou shalt spread abroad to the west, and to the east, and to the north, and to the south: and in thee and in thy seed shall all the families of the earth be blessed" (Genesis 28:14). It was in that exact sequence that the British Empire was established as the only non-totalitarian empire that the world has seen.

Israel was to have a monarch of the Davidic line: "For thus saith the Lord; David shall never want a man to sit upon the throne of the house of Israel" (Jeremiah 33:17). The people of the Jews do not have a monarchy and the Church is the Body of Christ, its Lord and Head. It can be shown that the Royal House of Britain is descended from King David. Further, the British monarchs are anointed in the same way as Zadok the Priest anointed the Kings of Israel (Details of the Coronation Service still used for the crowning of British Monarchs may be obtained by writing to our Headquarters).

Israel to be defended by God and as a global maritime power could not be defeated (Numbers 24:7-9). This was clearly seen in World Wars I and II and looking through our history, in many other great battles such as against the Spanish Armada and at Trafalgar.

Israel was to carry the Gospel to the whole world: "This people have I formed for myself; they shall show forth my praise" (Isaiah 43:21). This our great missionary enterprise achieved over past centuries. The Christian Gospel went with the British Empire.

The Stone of Israel must be in the possession of Joseph, the “fruitful bough” of the birthright (I Chronicles 5:2) blessing: “from thence is the shepherd, the stone of Israel” (Genesis 49:24). That is, from that time Joseph kept the stone of Israel, which God had said to his father Jacob: “This stone shall be God’s house” (Genesis 28:22-24), the great worldwide blessings on Joseph would ensue (Genesis 49:25-26). Why have British monarchs been crowned over a rough hewn piece of sandstone for over a thousand years?

When Queen Elizabeth II was presented with the Holy Bible at the Coronation Service these words were addressed to her: "Our gracious Queen: to keep your Majesty ever mindful of the Law and the Gospel of God as the Rule for the whole life and government of Christian Princes, we present you with this Book, the most valuable thing that this world affords."

During the anointing ceremony, the most sacred ceremony on earth, the choir sings the following words based on I Kings 1:39-40: "Zadok the Priest and Nathan the Prophet anointed Solomon king, and all the people rejoiced and said: God save the king, Long live the king. May the king live forever. Amen. Hallelujah." God save the King/Queen are the opening words of our National Anthem. Why do we follow the biblical pattern so precisely?

Why did George I stand up when he first heard Handel’s Hallelujah Chorus and why do we still stand on such occasions?

Admiral of the Fleet, Lord Fisher, 1st Baron Fisher of Kilverstone (1841-1920), once remarked: "We are a wonderful nation. Astounding how we muddle through. There is only one explanation – we are the Lost Ten Tribes."

British-Israel World Federation, British-Israel World Federation 2 Comments [7/29/2017 8:01:04 AM]
Fundie Index: 4
Submitted By: Katie

Quote# 129841

(an entry on Tv Tropes of a non-existent comic character from this guy's existent comic universe. It was later removed.)

The Gray Champion doesn't necessarily fight for America. He fights for those values of America's Christian past in its colonial years that he agreed with back then and continues to into the 21st century - even when a third of the nation itself rebels against those values, and ends up ripping the country apart as a consequence. The seceding states he has the fewest disagreements with are the ones he ends up protecting, letting the others freely choose their own paths to destruction. He reasons that it's a waste of time trying to help those who are that far lost when they're that dead-set against helping themselves. They don't want the truth, especially not from him, in the first place. Any effort to help them would only distract him from offering help to those who'd actually value it.


Dozerfleet, Tv Tropes 14 Comments [7/28/2017 7:39:41 AM]
Fundie Index: 1

Quote# 129803

Lady Checkmate's headline: "Conservatives Celebrate Trump for Transgender Military Ban"

Yes, we ARE VERY PLEASED with president Trump's stand against sexual immorality and insanity invading our military ranks. Good call sir. We salute you!

http://www.toddstarnes.com/column/president-trump-bans-transgenders-from-military-service

Don't forget to RECOMMEND. Lets get the Truth out so that Light may shine bright in this dark place and Jesus Christ may be glorified.Even if the discussion is closed, please still RECOMMEND.

Lady Checkmate, Disqus - Faith & Religion 10 Comments [7/27/2017 1:53:00 PM]
Fundie Index: 2
Submitted By: Jocasta

Quote# 129828

The Beatles Are of the Devil

“It is better to hear the rebuke of the wise, than for a man to hear the song of fools.” —Ecclesiastes 7:5


Please understand that I don't condemn anyone, for the Bible condemns all of us as guilty, dirty, rotten, hell-deserving sinners. My salvation solely rests in Christ's righteousness, because of the precious blood that He gave for our sins. My intention is not to be unkind; but rather, to expose the demonic nature of Rock 'N' Roll.

The Beatles still top the charts for all-time albums sold, amounting to billions of dollars in profits. Tragically, The Beatles were heathen Communists, who praised false religions, glorified sexual immorality, and even blasphemed the Lord Jesus Christ throughout their careers.

It was Paul McCartney of The Beatles who said...

“We probably seem to be anti-religious. . . none of us believes in God.” (Hit Parader, Jan 1970, p.15)

Band member, John Lennon said...

“Christianity will go, it will vanish and shrink. I needn't argue about that. I'm right and will be proved right. . . .We're more popular than Jesus now.” (San Francisco Chronicle, April 13, 1966, p.26)

John Lennon, in his book, A Spaniard in the Works, portrays Jesus Christ as...

“Jesus El Pifico, a garlic-eating, stinking little yellow, greasy fascist bastard catholic Spaniard.” (A Spaniard in the Works, p.14).

Yet, The Beatles are praised in society as if they're heroes. I once told a man that The Beatles were Communists. He said he didn't believe it, until he heard The Beatle's song, Back In The U.S.S.R. (...boy you don't know how lucky you are!). The Beatles praised Communist leaders, promoted illegal drug usage, defiled themselves in backstage sex orgies, and glorified sin with their music.


[...]




Photo to left: Most people recognize the Satanic hand sign which John Lennon is making at the bottom right; but, few people realize that the "ok" sign which Paul McCartney is making at the bottom left is also very Satanic.

The "ok" sign is actually three 6's, each of the three vertical fingers forming an individual 6. 666!

Paul McCartney produced a solo album in 1971 called "RAM." He is pictured fondling a RAM on his album cover? Why did Paul McCartney use a RAM on his album cover?



Goat of Mendes -Origin of the Satanic Hand Sign? ...

"The Goat of Mendez is the god of the witches. (Mendez is another spelling of Mendes, a city of ancient Egypt where fertility worship - Baal worship — was practiced). Masons admit readily that Baphomet is a pagan fertility god and, more importantly, that Freemasonry is a fertility cult religion. At any rate, this mockery of Jesus is a satanic symbol and figures prominently in Satan worship."Kerr Cuhulain (Occult author, police investigator, and friend of witches)



David J. Stewart, Jesus is Precious 21 Comments [7/27/2017 9:39:55 PM]
Fundie Index: 6

Quote# 2734

The UN building should be used as target practice for Army howitzers and that's about all the good that will ever come out of the UN.

spl_cadet, Theology Web 17 Comments [4/1/2003 12:00:00 AM]
Fundie Index: 5

Quote# 90989

Sorry, but everything ObamaHUSSEIN does is heavily scripted!
Nothing is done that hasn’t been cleared by his Superiors!
The Chinese use their left hand to wipe their asses as well as many other cultures! Obama knows exactly how perverted and insulting he was to Christians when he used the left handed reverse cross! Everyone of his Muslim Brotherhood Associates Loved watching Obama trash Christians yesterday as he does every day! How will he react if someone happens to burn his Quran?

[...]

Obama’s culture wipe their poop with a bare left hand as in China and then wash the hand whenever they get a chance! So they always use their right hand for signs of respect and eating!
Obama is disgusting and Treasonous!

True Republican Patriot, Free Republic 42 Comments [11/27/2012 4:34:44 AM]
Fundie Index: 48

Quote# 129872

I really appreciate it. The more I talk about the issue, the more receptive people are toward it. My experiences are leading me to believe that perhaps I am supposed to do something about it.

It is absolutely (and unfortunately) true that for most gay men it is simply a matter of time before they start living the lifestyle and leaving the Church. And for the most part, they feel like they have no alternative. It just doesn't make any sense to most people: be miserable for something you can hardly understand or be happy with things you can touch and feel. You have to ask yourself, if you were in that position, what would you do? Would it make any sense to sit alone at home missing out on your life? Those aren't the real options, of course, but it's the only thing gay people can see.

I don't think most members of the Church understand the unique sacrifice they expect from homosexuals. They'll say things like "well, the Church expects everyone to be chaste outside of marriage!" without really understanding what this means for the homosexual. A straight, chaste man always has a chance. There's hope. He'll find a girl that really gets him excited, he'll marry her, and he'll settle down, start a family, be happy. Even if he never does, there's always that hope. And even if he never does, he doesn't have to live his life completely outside of culture.

A homosexual on the other hand gets no choice. He's put in a situation where his only choice is celibacy for the rest of his life. There's often no hope at all. It's despair. It feels like holding your breath for the rest of your life. And you hardly even know why. Also, you never get to feel like you're really a part of culture, a part of real life. If you choose to follow the Church, you're a complete outsider. You're almost even a fake, a traitor. If you don't follow the Church, you lose your entire religion, and you spend the rest of your life mimicking the real thing.

I think the Church has a duty to explain these things to people, to show them why homosexuality is condemned, outside of appealing to scripture. She has a duty to defend philosophy that points to truth. Right now, I actually think she is failing. And I don't think it's a matter of just being full of more love, or anything like that. She has a duty to actually get down and explain the natural law.

Hurrah_for_Karamazov, r/Catholicism 13 Comments [7/28/2017 2:27:49 PM]
Fundie Index: 4
Submitted By: Katie

Quote# 129844

As a avid “long-range sports enthusiast”, I offer my take on how to handle “lefty sponsored” civil war. Using the “Trinity” shooting technique, you ” reserve the first shot for anyone who voted to put BHO in office, the second shot for those who decided to put him back there again, and also wanted HRC (BHO’s Chamber Maid) elected, and the third shot for the THREAT”!

justtryit, Ammoland 13 Comments [7/28/2017 7:40:19 AM]
Fundie Index: 5
Submitted By: DiarrheaMan

Quote# 50430

Quote:
Originally Posted by pre70thweek
When did the terrorists attack from Iraq?

They didn't. Nobody has ever claimed they did. They attacked from WITHIN America....

....but Iraq provided safe haven for al Qaeda....provided them three training camps.....provided them financial support....

....abu Musab al-Zarqawi (now in hell) was the head of a wing of al Qaeda in Iraq formed in 2001...

....Saddam tortured and murdered an average of 100,000 civilians a year....

.....Saddam paid $25,000 to the family of Arabs in Israel who slaughtered Jews....


My God, it is so elementary......why am I wasting my time explaining the obvious.... Leftists will ignore the truth and continue apologizing for terror until the Messiah comes...

scapegoat, Rapture Ready 37 Comments [10/22/2008 7:17:49 PM]
Fundie Index: 4
Submitted By: cc