Quote# 137148

The demonic band JUDAS PRIEST (the name alone is blasphemy against God) also uses backward masking. Back in the early days of the band they were sued and taken to court, accused of including subliminal messages into their music. The band's frontman and flaming homosexual, Rob Halford denied the accusations in court, which today cannot be denied anymore. Thousands of Rock and mainstream music groups have used been caught inserting deceptive backward masking into their music. Even the so-called evangelical wholesome boy band from New Jersey, THE JONAS BROTHERS included backward masking in their song, KIDS OF THE FUTURE which says “I speak for Satan, Satan, Satan. My sweet forsaken Satan, Satan!!!” The big question is why? The obvious answer is that some evil people are trying to trick your mind, inserting thoughts into your brain that you (under normal circumstances) would likely never approve of.

The lead singer (frontman) of the heavy-metal band JUDAS PRIEST is a flaming homosexual. For decades rugged men have been idolizing Judas Priest as a tough, manly group because of their heavy-metal, black leather, spikes and tattoos. All of a sudden, in 1998, the lead singer announces that he's a homosexual. This is more proof that all Rock music is saturated and rooted in sexual perversion, the New World Order and rebellion against God. Hell hath enlarged herself (Isaiah 5:14). The music industry is saturated with lesbians and homosexuals. It is very common for Rock singers to dress like transvestites. There's an evil spirit in Rock music that compels singers and musicians to do bizarre, freakish and demented things. Many Rock stars puke out fake blood in concert; such as Kiss and Motley Crue.

In one of Motley Crue's concerts a whorish woman comes out on stage with an actual electric grinder, touching it to her breasts and private area (covered with a shaped metal plate), causing sparks to fly for about 10 feet toward the audience. This is the sicko minds of the Rock music industry. You wouldn't believe the insane, demonic and shameful things that go on during Rock concerts. Some bands toss butchered animal parts and blood during concert, others defecate on stage, et cetera. Marilyn Manson pierced his own chest in a concert, and the blood ran down his body. You never hear anyone criticize these crazy people; but faithful preachers who help tens-of-thousands of people, even millions like Pastor Jack Hyles are demonized on the internet.

David J. Stewart, Jesus is Savior 20 Comments [3/9/2018 12:26:06 PM]
Fundie Index: 4

Quote# 137152

Okay, I tried, but I can't hold my tongue any longer on your IDIOTIC posts.

This is exactly the kind of presuppositional FOOLISHNESS that belches out of the mouths of armchair "scientists" when common core meets the FAITH of the Church of Darwin.

The absence of kangaroo fossils are not remarkable anymore than you not seeing fossils from roadkill today.

How much roadkill do you EVER see fossilized? ZERO! Why aren't you WHINING about that FACT?

Likewise your a-priori commitment to the fossilizing of kangaroos as they "hopped to Australia" REQUIRES rapid entombment to fossilize. Were you expecting another flood to entomb the survivors of the flood?

Here's a really easy to understand article if you can't extrapolate what I'm saying:


Tele Man, Disqus Grace and Truth 8 Comments [3/9/2018 12:26:51 PM]
Fundie Index: 5

Quote# 137158

My ancestors came to America from Europe, and I'm glad that they had the sense not to miscegenate with the AmerIndians. Before we put the AmerIndians on such a pedestal, we should remember what Hell they put the European settlers through. The Injuns love to fight, get very drunk on small servings of alcohol unlike us Caucasians, and want to wreak havoc once they are snookered. In the Upper Midwest, German and Scandinavian settlers went through Hell with these savages, who were the aggressors 99% of the time. The wild Indians could not just allow folks to peacefully farm the land the Government had sold them. My forebears hated the Native Americans, and had good reason to hate these angry savages who were always attacking for no reason. I'd rather have Arabic Christians from Syria and Lebanon living next to me than some drunken Injun that wants to fight all of the time for absolutely no reason whatsoever, other than their own irascible temperament. I'll take an Injun over a Negro or their Mestizo Chalupa Eater racial cousins, but that is about it. Injuns need to stay segregated from Whites, and intimate relations with them is, IMO, most definitely miscegenation. As far as Yeagley, I liked what he had to say about Whites not allowing our country to be taken from us. I also considered him non-White, and found his referring to himself as a Kraut very off-putting. German Americans calling ourselves Krauts would be akin to Italian Americans calling themselves Dagos, Irish Americans calling themselves Micks, etc. Yeagley was an AmerIndian first and foremost, just like these Mestizos and Mulattoes in that he was most in touch with his non-White side.

OHDeutschePolkaConfederate, American Renaissance 6 Comments [3/10/2018 2:34:47 AM]
Fundie Index: 1

Quote# 137160

Yeagley himself was a decent man, yes, and I respected what he had to say, and respect the friendship he had with Jared Taylor. Let us not forget, however, that the AmerIndians play the race card and victim game just like the Negroids and Mestizos, and know exactly what they are doing. A reservation may not be the violence place that the Black Ghetto is, that is true, but it is nothing great. All of those tasteless jokes the Libtarded Media makes denigrating poor Whites more than apply to Indian Reservations. Meth Labs, Welfare Checks, and Casinos.

ODDeutschePolkaConfederate, American Renaissance 4 Comments [3/10/2018 2:35:28 AM]
Fundie Index: 2

Quote# 137173

The thing is, the conservatives speaking out against this are the some of the same conservatives who also celebrate disemploying and jailing people for racism, anti-semitism, and Holocaust denial, and support both state and federal laws criminalizing speech in support of the Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions Movement and denying federal contracts to corporations that boycott Israel. All of which result in penalties considerably more harsh than simply not being able to graduate from one particular university.

Why is the enforcement of the cuckservative narrative any more acceptable to these self-professed champions of free speech than the SJW narrative or the Fake Science narrative?

So, to be blunt, I don't give a damn about any these so-called "free speech" rights anymore. The First Amendment is observably dead and it's now clearly all just a power game of "who, whom" between rival identity groups, which means it is time for Anglo-American Christians to go back to having the temporal courts enforce blasphemy laws that criminalize all blasphemies against God, including denying His being or providence, all contumelious reproaches of Jesus Christ, all profane scoffing at the Holy Scriptures, and exposing any part thereof to contempt or ridicule, and punish violators with death, imprisonment, corporal punishment and fine.

That is not only more legitimate than these various anti-speech laws and public policies, it is actually part of the common law that has been degraded by non-Anglo immigrants who never understood it due to their historical lack of exposure to it.

Vox Day, Vox Popoli 3 Comments [3/10/2018 11:06:50 AM]
Fundie Index: 5

Quote# 36471

[on the topic of online evangelism]

I'm sorta the same way LucciusJulius when I'm playing Halo on X-Box live, a great ice breaker to talk about my faith is to say: "You know Master Cheif isn't the only one who gave his life to save humanity."

JoeGForce, Christian Forums 77 Comments [3/19/2008 7:12:36 PM]
Fundie Index: 4
Submitted By: Lizbet

Quote# 36473

[On the topic of proving the other religions (before and after christ) is false]

Take a look at genesis. You are pagan, no true Christian would defend a pagan religion. Yes I can. Through the Bible I know they are false, can you prove otherwise?

SpecterSparten, Youtube 32 Comments [3/20/2008 4:51:43 AM]
Fundie Index: 3
Submitted By: ChildeofMalkav

Quote# 36452

I hate to break it to BOTH of you .... but the U.S.A WAS built on Christianity! I would love for you to show me how it wasn't when our money, monuments, and Declaration of Independance was all clearly created and written under GOD! Our entire history is built on Christianity! Swearing in on a Bible in court??? I mean really ... it's all around us! The US has become a melting pot of all religions .... HOWEVER .... let's get a bunch of Americans together and go overseas somewhere and DEMAND that they remove all of their religious material from all government things b/c we're offended by them! HA! What a joke ... that would NEVER happen!

[Caseylynne - I hate to break it to you, but "under god wasn't added to the pledge until 1954, "in god we trust" wasn't accepted as a national motto until 1956, and was first printed on U.S. currency during the Civil War... so much for being founded on christian principles]

Ok ... so the Constitution, and the first 10 amendments don't contain the word God .... doesn't mean anything! The Declaration of Independence, AND ALL our money has the word God in it .... not to mention our Pledge of Alligence! So i think that makes your argument invalid as well!

caseylynne83, WRAL.com 66 Comments [3/20/2008 12:08:05 PM]
Fundie Index: 8

Quote# 36491

Females should be married once they are able to have children (this is at year 12, 13, or 14 worldwide).
Do you like that women have, by the power of their vote, denied you your God given right to a virgin wife?
Do you like that if you do have a wife she can divorce you at any time and make your life hell?
Do you enjoy your lack of freedom to speak freely due to women filing verbal sexual harrasment claims against men?
Do you like that it is believed that women should own weapons because they need to beable to murder men with them for protection against those who they instead should be helping (females were created by God as an asset for men, not to be the enemy of man that they are today.)
Do you like that you cannot aquire the weapons or goods that you wish to own because women have voted them to be outlawed?
Do you like that your wife can and does deny you sex even though it is you who should be her master?
Do you like that the weaker vessel (woman) controls the stronger (man) because she has the power of the police backing her?
Do you like dying in war so that women in other countries can have these same rights and freedoms against men in other countries?

Anonymous, happypenguin.org comments 98 Comments [3/20/2008 2:33:09 PM]
Fundie Index: 21

Quote# 136902

MO bishop convicted for failing to report child abuse; 1st US bishop convicted in such case


To be fair, I wouldn't also report it. Narcing is morally more despicable than anything the priest did (took a couple of photos).

xomaleo, reddit 2 Comments [3/10/2018 9:29:27 AM]
Fundie Index: 2

Quote# 137169

Pro-death is forever.

Once you have killed that innocent child, there is no undoing that.

All of your questions pertain to killing those living humans outside of the womb as well as inside of the womb.

Based on the "logic" of your questions, you have just justified killing the homeless, the uninsured, all children up to the age of adulthood, the disabled, the incarcerated, impoverished children in other countries, children with cancer, victims of gang violence, HIV victims, and LGBT.

Are you Muslim by any chance - you sure do love death for all kinds of people. You left out sex selection abortions and honor killings for little girls - all to save your precious State money.

Kill them all so they don't suffer, right?!? That is YOUR view. Thank you for your transparency!

It must be so easy to be "pro-choice" when YOU are not the one being aborted.

WorldGoneCrazy-NotMurderedYet, Live Action News 5 Comments [3/10/2018 9:58:41 AM]
Fundie Index: 2
Submitted By: Jocasta

Quote# 137058

[You're a mean one, Mr. Day, you really are a Beale]

The reason the ideological Right has limited cultural power these days is because the Left, with (((David Brooks))) and his nation in the vanguard, have worked very hard for at least four generations at attempting to eradicate everything from the culture that betrays any sign of Christian influence or Western tradition.

And the reason that they are failing despite their near-complete control of the cultural high ground is because they have literally nothing to offer in its place. All they ever had to offer was reaction, negation, ugliness, filth, and snark. Sure, you can adulterate Christmas, and you can substitute Silver Bells, shopping, Santa, and Seasons Greetings for Silent Night, Hark the Herald Angels Sing, Scrooge, and We Wish You a Merry Christmas, but at the end of the day, either you come up with a substitute or your efforts will eventually prove futile.

What did they come up with in over a century of frantic effort? Festivus, the Hannukah Aardvark, and horrible movies that are bad even by Seth Rogen's standards. Hardly an attractive exchange for even the most godless pagan.

We not only can win this cultural war, we cannot lose it so long as we continue to create things that are good, beautiful, and true, and continue to refuse entrance to the infiltrating wormtongues who are always there with their helpful blandishments and seductive offers to sell your creative soul to Mammon.

So let them turn Elsa of the Crowleyesque anthem into a lesbian. Let them transform Superman into an SJW superhero fighting for global migration, one-world government, and AIPAC. Let them continue to preen and posture and sneer and snark in futility. It will avail them nothing. Like their Father the Devil, they cannot create, they can only corrupt. And that is why the greatness of Tolkien, of Howard, of Lovecraft, and of Wright will continue to be recognized over time despite the Left's best efforts to denigrate and diminish it.

Vox Day, Vox Popoli 5 Comments [3/10/2018 10:21:10 AM]
Fundie Index: 5

Quote# 137099

Sure! To get started there’s this video where they discuss the amount of funding the trans lobby has accrued in a very short time. And there’s this post by Miranda Yardley. He touches on the rich autogynephiles in positions of power in trans lobby organizations, and how these same organizations get millions of $$$ in bourgeois patronage from Starbucks, Apple, NBC, etc. Here’s another blogger who noticed how much elite support transgenderism has received.

Wealthy white men are at the top of the trans lobby. Magdalen Berns even responded to a VICE video which gave a glimpse of how many rich autogynephiles live in New York. Spoiler: there’s a lot. Not only do they tend to be wealthy, but they were inundated in strict conservatism growing up, so they tend to gravitate to a wholly stereotyped vision of “womanhood” that looks like it came out of the 50s. Unsurprisingly, their foray into transgenderism is always sexually charged and there’s at least an implied fetish element. So transgenderism is under the ideological leadership of the world’s least oppressed people.

Transgenderism accomplishes a ton of bourgeois goals all at once. It promotes woman-hatred. It is obliterating the concept of womanhood in popular discourse. It is completely destroying feminism through a divide-and-rule strategy; liberal feminists are employed as flying monkeys and radical feminists are subjected to extreme censorship and violence. It is an automatic backlash against the meager gains for LGB rights in the past couple decades; it has rebranded conversion therapy as progressive; it has declared lesbianism transphobic; and it has introduced “gender identity” into anti-discrimination laws, which completely nullifies protections on the basis of sex and sexual orientation. It has given privileged white men an oppressed card, which has completely slowed down the black liberation movement and the socialist movement, as both these movements try to reconcile fighting for the oppressed while obeying the whim of whiny narcissists. It helps spread imperialism when it starts getting exported into the third world and picks up “culturally specific genders” as its pawns.

It’s also extremely profitable. At the base of transgenderism are some utterly reactionary philosophical assumptions. Transgenderism is idealist, meaning it elevates the mind and subjective feeling above material reality. It is mechanical, meaning it encourages the view that reality is made up of frozen parts, instead of the dialectical view that reality is a dynamic whole. In practice it relies on sophistry and fascist violence. Of course it hasn’t introduced these ways of thinking into capitalist society, but it is fundamentally a product of these ways of thinking.

communistroader, Tumblr 4 Comments [3/10/2018 1:14:42 PM]
Fundie Index: 2
Submitted By: Katie

Quote# 136933

I do not hate freedom. But I hate selfish sociopaths who who use "freedom" as a shield to hide behind while caring not in the slightest for anyone else's freedom or the other needs of society.

And projection it is. I care for others, look at any the averages, right wingers donate more than liberals. And you say not caring for anyone else’s freedom? On what they are free unlike In a socialist system where they can’t voluntarily transact. It’s not charitable to reach into some one else’s wallet man, dig into your own. Obviously you lack the basic knowledge of the situation or you would be on my side.

a socialist system where they can’t voluntarily transact.

Which I do not advocate (in character or in reality), nor does any but a few fringe lunatics with zero relevance in real life.
Obviously you lack the basic knowledge of the situation or you would be on my side.

[eyerolling smiley]

cough fascist Blackshirt thugs aka antifa cough not to mention corbyn having a literal communist and attending communist meetings... well to be fair europe is unimportant anyways

FreedLymonia, NationStates 2 Comments [3/10/2018 9:39:44 AM]
Fundie Index: 1
Submitted By: Pharaoh Bastethotep

Quote# 137161

I prefer the more accurate term of art “countersemitic”. (The ADL, unsurprisingly, does not.) We are countering the malicious agenda of a hostile minority intent on drowning us in foreign invaders, trite consumerism, backbreaking debt, endless interventionist wars, and basically anything that destroys the historical and cultural bonds of the majority’s community, neighborhood, town, and nation.

Free Trade is practically a euphemism for Open Borders. The underlying motivation of the neocons and their useful signalers is One World Deracination. Neocon Globalists love free trade because they love open borders, cheap dispensable labor, and a terrorformed society that restricts the ability of Whites to act as a bloc and petition for their own interests. Arguing from the relatively benign premise of free trade allows the shift to “free movement of labor” rhetoric, which is the real goal of the Nation Wreckers.

Most fortunately for the Nation Saviors, “free trade” has become justifiably saddled with negative connotations, so this neocon sleight of rhetoric no longer works as well as it once did (there are still GOPe cuck hold-outs, but they’ll bend the knee to Trumpism in due time). Tariffs, for example, are immensely popular, and support cuts across voter demos. The latest poll has 80% of Americans supporting Trump’s tariffs.

Neocon Globalists pull more than their weight, but they aren’t acting alone. The universalist strain runs deep in neoliberal Gentile Whites.

Ovidiu Stoica notices,

It is a continuation of the liberal project of modernity which started in the 18th century but got trapped inside the national state because of nationalism. The goal is universal individualism and contractual only relations between individuals- no non-commercial (not chosen) community ties&bonds which would limit the individual.

Pure transactionalism is, ironically, dehumanizing of the individual, because we didn’t evolve in a social vacuum. There are those who would like us atomized and vacuum-sealed, but they don’t have the majority’s interests at heart, so it’s smart to dismiss their agitations as the effluvium of tribal spite, and to stop pretending they are worth heeding and that they know what’s best for us.


Why? is a great question, and “social status striving” left to stew in a cauldron of envy and in-group favoritism is the answer. Status striving to feed an insatiable ego is a powerful force, powerful enough in some successful but implacably resentful minority groups to convince them to destroy the country they live in to spite the majority. As well, this particular group (and others who have evolved a similar temperament) may be better able to handle the societal instability their spite creates, and so for them the increase in their relative power vis-à-vis the shrinking majority is worth the comparatively smaller decrease in their well-being caused by the consequences of their monstrous Babelic creation.

CH, Chateau Heartiste 1 Comments [3/10/2018 2:35:33 AM]
Fundie Index: 3

Quote# 137166

The fossil record proves the Great Flood, not evolution.

By referring to Christian behavior, I was referring to those who are truly born again and who walk that way. You can spot them by the kind of fruit they have.

The living breathing God was demonstrated when Jesus Christ, an historical figure, walked the earth. He is alive to this day, and seated on the right hand side of His Father. You can talk to Him any time, read His works in the greatest Book (and world's bestseller) to this day. He still does miracles, answers prayers, and forgives sins. If you tried Him (tested Him, proved Him, sought Him), you'd be blown away.

Guest Verified, Christian News Network 11 Comments [3/10/2018 2:46:44 AM]
Fundie Index: 4

Quote# 137167

I didn't say that because many major scientists believed in Creationism that it proved Creationism is real. I was merely pointing out that being a scientist does not mean one is not a Creationist, and that all scientists are not evolutionists.

If someone uses the Bible to justify racism, they are making up things since racism isn't in the Bible. However, if someone uses evolution to fuel their racism, well, that is what evolution is based upon. It surely isn't built upon science.

Evolution has never been proven. Even evolutionists will tell you that.

Guest Verified, Christian News Network 11 Comments [3/10/2018 2:46:49 AM]
Fundie Index: 2

Quote# 135609

My name is Lauren DeCarlo. I am 26 years old. I just wanted to thank for everything you have done. Thank you so much for helping me actually learn how read the Bible. I use to have religion, which did nothing for me, and I literally believed you had to be mostly a good person and have faith in order to get to heaven, and it lead me feeling empty and alone. Then when I came to your site, I realized I was utterly wrong. I found your site when I was in High School and oddly had/have a neck problem just like yourself and my experience with the pain in my neck truly humbled me along with your amazing site, showing how short life is and we all can get sick. Found a certain truth that just because I was young, it doesn't matter, when your time is up, it's up. It got me questioning life after death. I put in a Bible quote and your site came up. I believed the the first time I read your article on: How To Be Born Again and by the grace of God I believed and He lead me to your website. I use to be self-righteous and thought I was mostly good when I of course wasn't. Only Jesus is good, and only His righteousness can get you into Heaven by His precious innocent blood. Thank you for being Gods messenger and your honesty. I love your website, and love you very much for creating it; you are truly blessed. You are a truth teller in a world so false.

Thank you from the bottom of my heart! An email is not enough but I'm glad you made a way for believers to email you. Thank you times infinity.


Lauren, Jesus is Savior 49 Comments [12/30/2017 11:30:05 AM]
Fundie Index: 7

Quote# 136829

So-called "tough love", coined by James Dobson, has harmed and put more kids on the street homeless by their own parents, simply for being born gay.
No -- it's not "love" at all.

Ken Faivor:
Bleeding heart for those who live in sin are you?..... Not me, sin has consequences. This has to be learned, he earlier the better. If it's not learned here where will you learn it?........ In hell?........To late.
This is why mothers don't make good fathers......They like to coddle.

Just... wow.
You advocate throwing your own child out on the street simply because they were born gay?
That's the definition of heartless.
(And insulting me because I'm a mother? Seriously?)

Ken Faivor:
Yes, seriously.......A big problem today. Kids being brought up without a proper father figure......Maybe that's why some are gay.....You think? Mommy's boy's.

No, that's not why they are gay. They're gay because that's how they were born. Everyone's orientation is an innate human quality.
You think disowning your child, throwing them out and making them homeless is acceptable?
No, it's neither "tough" nor "love".
It's *cowardice* and *fear*, directed at your own child.

Ken Faivor:
You being so defensive makes me think you have a gay son......Do you?

I'm a lesbian. And I know people who've experienced the reality of so-called "tough love" -- the reality of receiving hate, fear and indifference along with a complete lack of care for their own children.
I didn't experience that when I came out, because my family didn't disown me, throw me out and try to explain away the reality of having a gay child. They continued to love and accept me as I do for them. In fact, precisely *because* they didn't listen to Dobson's nonsense, our family relationship is stronger than it has ever been and our faith has grown immeasurably as well.

Ken Faivor:
Well, your family can accept you as a lesbian if they want to, but God won't.......How do you feel about that?

Ken Faivor, Disqus - Religion 6 Comments [3/10/2018 8:50:04 AM]
Fundie Index: 4
Submitted By: Jocasta

Quote# 136833

The right of decent private citizens to personally possess, transport, and responsibly use arms without government interference is the ultimate freedom and the main pillar supporting all other liberties. Few cultures have allowed their general population access to weapons, the tools of power, to the same degree as the United States. Instead, most societies have restricted the keeping and bearing of arms to a select few power brokers and their agents, often resulting in oppression on a grand scale.

Despite a massive amount of historical evidence to the contrary, there is a substantial body of Americans, many occupying positions of influence, who contend that the abrogation of the Second Amendment is the quickest path to domestic tranquility. Since this is as absurd as advocating blood-letting as a cure for anemia, it would seem advisable to question the motives and mentalities of the gun control advocates themselves.

In my observation, weapon prohibitionists can be broken down into seven major categories. Even though their motives may vary they all pose a mortal threat to liberty.

Many of those in favor of oppressive firearms legislation are are best classed as elitists. Elitists frequently identify with a peer group based on wealth, power, rank, social status, occupation, education, ethnic group, etc. and perceive themselves and their peers as inherently superior to and more responsible than the "common people", thus more deserving of certain rights. Since elitists practically consider those outside their class or caste as members of another species, that most anti-elitist list of laws, the Bill of Rights is viewed by them as anathema. Naturally, the Second Amendment is their first target as it serves as the supporting structure for other nine amendments.

Another type of individual who favors the restriction of private gun ownership is the authoritarian. Authoritarian personalities are characterized by their belief in unquestioning obedience to an authority figure or group and a disdain for individual freedom of action, expression, and judgement. Those with authoritarian personalities function well in symbiosis with elitists occupying positions of power. Because authoritarians repress their desires for autonomy they harbor a deep resentment toward free and independent thinkers. Of course authoritarians do not want firearms in the hands of the general population as this constitutes a major obstacle to fulfilling their pathological and obsessive desire to control people.

It goes without saying that career criminals would like to see the public disarmed for obvious reasons. A well-armed population makes crimes such as assault, robbery, and burglary hazardous for the perpetrator and this is bad for "business." Also, it would seem that even non-violent or "white collar" criminals live in constant fear of retribution from the public that they financially bleed and would therefore prefer that the public be disarmed. Evidence supporting this hypothesis can be gathered by studying the Second Amendment voting records of those legislators who have been convicted of willful misconduct.

Cowards by definition are easily or excessively frightened by things and situations that are recognized as dangerous, difficult, or painful. It therefore stands to reason that the mere thought of guns and the circumstances in which they are employed causes them abnormal amounts of stress. Rather than admit their weakness to themselves or others, some fearful types jump on the anti-gun bandwagon and purport moral superiority to those "barbaric"enough to employ lethal force against armed assailants by claiming various humanitarian and pragmatic motives for allowing evil to remain unchecked. In reality, many of these individuals harbor an envy induced resentment toward anyone with the means, skill, and will to successfully stand up to criminal aggression.

The desire to assert oneself exists in nearly everyone, wimps included, so cowards seek out tame enemies against whom they can ply their pitiful brand of machismo. Instead of the sociopaths who commit acts of wanton aggression with guns, guns themselves and responsible gun owners are the main targets of their attacks. After all, real criminals are dangerous, so cowards prefer doing battle with inanimate objects that do not have a will of their own and decent law-abiding people whose high level of integrity and self discipline prevent them from physically lashing out against mere verbal assailants, however obnoxious they may be.

Ideological chameleons follow the simple social strategy of avoiding controversy and confrontation by espousing the beliefs of the people in their immediate vicinity or advocating the philosophy of those who scream the loudest in a debate. Quite a few supposedly pro Second Amendment public officials have shown themselves to be ideological chameleons when they supported restrictions on the private possession of military style semiautomatic rifles following recent atrocities in which such firearms were employed. Like their reptilian namesake, people who merely blend in with the ambient philosophical foliage seem to have little insight into the moral and social ramifications of their actions. Political and/or economic gain along with avoidance of confrontation are their only goals.

Security monopolists are those members and representatives of public and private security providing concerns who want the means of self protection out of private hands so that they can command high fees for protecting the citizenry against the rising tide of crime. These profiteers stand to loose a great deal of capital if citizens can efficiently defend themselves. To the security monopolist, each criminal who enters and exits the revolving door of justice is a renewable source of revenue providing jobs for police, social workers, victim counsellors, judges, prison employees, security guards, burglar alarm installers, locksmiths, and others employed by the security monopolies or their satellite organizations. No wonder it is so common for an honest citizen to be more ruthlessly hounded by the authorities when he shoots a criminal in self defense than a criminal who shoots honest citizens.

Just as a limb will weaken and atrophy if not used, so will aspects of the mind fail to develop if nothing in one’s environment exists to challenge them. People who have led excessively sheltered lives tend to have a difficult time understanding certain cause and effect relationships and an even harder time appreciating just how cruel the world can be. These dysfunctionally unworldly types are truly perplexed at the very notion of firearms ownership with regard to defense. To them, tyranny and crime are things that happen in other places far removed from their "civilized" universe. Also, they do not understand the value of private property and why some people would fight for theirs since they never had to work hard to acquire what they possess. While those suffering from dysfunctional unworldliness are most often people who have been born into considerable wealth, this condition is also common in members of the clergy, academicians, practioners of the arts, and others who have spent much of their lives cloistered in a safe and pampering environment. While many of these people may be quite talented and intelligent in some ways, their extreme naivety makes them easy prey for the tyrants who use them for the financial support and favorable advertisement of their regimes. Needless to say, the anti-gun movement is well represented and financed by the dysfunctionally unworldly.

The price of liberty is eternal vigilance, and it behooves all vigilant lovers of liberty to know and be able to recognize the various types of arms prohibitionists and understand their differing but equally dangerous motives. Acquiring knowledge of one’s foes is the first step toward defeating them. We must never forget that a threat to private firearms ownership is a threat to all freedoms.

The inalienable and fundamental right to keep and bear arms which is enumerated by (but actually predates) the Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution is not about hunting, gun collecting, or target shooting. Its purpose is to insure that every responsible American personally possesses the means to defend the Republic from all forms of tyranny, within and without. It is what permits the other nine Amendments in the Bill of Rights to be more than mere hollow phrases on a piece of paper. Its free exercise is the antithesis of serfdom and the only meaningful form of holocaust insurance known to man.

We must never insult and degrade the spirits of our Founding Fathers by permitting the Second Amendment, the pillar of freedom, to be destroyed by the cold flame of legislative ink.

Gus Cotey Jr, Jews For The Preservation Of Firearm Ownership  1 Comments [3/10/2018 8:51:38 AM]
Fundie Index: 2
Submitted By: Yossarian Lives

Quote# 136906

(Arguing against Annhilationism)

Responding to Ronnie's latest above: I was speaking from a pagan's point of view. If there won't be a final accounting for my sins, why should I repent of them and be saved? Why not live it up, knowing that God will merely annihilate me, rather than make me suffer as I have made others suffer? From nothing into nothing? Most pagans believe that already. Are we to tell them that they're right, that all that religious talk about hellfire and eternal damnation is just rot, and that an eternity without God and Christ is no big deal? Are we not comforting them in their sins? A strange form of evangelism, to be sure.
And yes, I do believe in degrees of punishment in hell, just as I believe in degrees of reward in heaven (Rev. 20:11-25). The greatest torment will lie in being separated from the presence of God by one's own choice, forever.

Mark, Deeper Waters Apologetics 3 Comments [3/10/2018 9:35:09 AM]
Fundie Index: 1

Quote# 137003

The United States Constitution guarantees us the right to worship God unimpaired by the United States government. It in no way shape or form guarantees us the right not to worship God.

ari, Y! answers 4 Comments [3/10/2018 9:42:51 AM]
Fundie Index: 3

Quote# 137019

Anytime you atheist attack God it's usually because you're bitter towards Him. I don't even think [Disqus user] goo gle is an atheist. Most of you here are not atheist, just mad at God for something that you think He did wrong, some injustice that befell you that you blame God for........And this site is your vengeance. As if you can hurt God in any way. Or some of you just plain want to live in the flesh without any restrictions. It's not because you don't believe He exist. Most of you aren't really atheist at all, or you sure wouldn't be on a religion channel kicking something that don't exist..........Who do you think you're fooling?

Ken Faivor, Disqus - Religion 4 Comments [3/10/2018 9:44:03 AM]
Fundie Index: 3
Submitted By: Jocasta

Quote# 137047

He seriously wants to take YOUR unalienable right to self-defense away. He does not respect your Second Amendment rights. At all.

So, why should we respect his First Amendment rights? We should not, as NN Taleb advises in his excellent new book Skin in the Game.

Start by being nice to everyone person you meet. But if someone tries to exercise power over you, exercise power over him.

This philosophy means that every individual who attempts to infringe on our Second Amendment rights, in any way, has lost any claim to our consideration for their First Amendment rights.

Vox Day, Vox Popoli 1 Comments [3/10/2018 10:15:43 AM]
Fundie Index: 1

Quote# 137052

A Muhammadan once told me that the West is the greatest danger to civilization in the world, and I responded by saying that the West is civilization, and everything else, save a few East Asian countries, is barbarity.

I believe that this is supported by fact: every other "civilization," be it the Muhammadans, Jews, Africans, Aztecs, Incas, Aborigines or Indians are plagued with superstition, irrationality, mutilation practices, low intelligence and various forms of degeneracy.

It was the West that produced the Industrial Revolution, the West that gave women equality, the West that invented the telephone, car, internet, computers, the printing press, and antibiotics.

The only other civilization that has ever been able to compete with the West on any level was East Asian Civilization- exclusively China and Japan who invented paper, firearms and the steam engine, and who were for a brief period more advanced than us until the Industrial Revolution.

It has been a mixture of our race, culture and values that has produced this, and which has made the West worth preserving and defending.

Nationalist1776, Stormfront 1 Comments [3/10/2018 10:17:40 AM]
Fundie Index: -1
Submitted By: Katie